Decoding the US Treasury’s principles for net zero financing and investment
12 October 2023
During New York City Climate Week, Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen announced the US Treasury’s Principles for Net Zero Financing and Investment. Designed to underscore the value of Net Zero commitments, promote consistency, and encourage greater adoption of best practices, the nine Principles provide a roadmap for financial services firms to produce credible net zero commitments and ensure alignment across their clients and the firms’ overall commitment. The principles can be summarized as follows:
-
Net Zero Commitments should be credible & 1.5°C-aligned
-
Consider transition finance, managed phaseout, and climate solutions to realize commitments
-
Metrics & targets should be credible and integrated in business activities
-
Assess client and portfolio company alignment to Net Zero commitment
-
Align engagement practices to Net Zero commitments
-
Integrate Net Zero goals into business and operating procedures
-
Establish robust governance processes to provide oversight on implementation of commitments
-
Account for environmental justice and environmental impacts in Net Zero transition plans
-
Be transparent in commitments and progress towards them
The announcement came as something of a surprise, as the regulatory community is still awaiting the SEC’s final climate disclosure rules, which are expected to introduce significant mandatory reporting requirements for all listed US firms.
The Treasury Principles are more narrowly focused on financial services firms and net zero investing, but they provide a broad overarching framework that aligns and overlaps with existing disclosure and transition plan frameworks, including the UK’s Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT) and the IFRS’ ISSB disclosure standards, making it a valuable reference for firms looking to align their net zero investing strategy with international requirements.
Under Principle 4 of the Treasury’s recommendations, financial institutions should assess client and portfolio company alignment to net zero targets, including forward-looking metrics, Scope 1-3 emissions footprint, and governance mechanisms.
Similarly, TPT requires companies to develop internal policies to support transition plans and build a culture aligned to it. Both frameworks also stress the importance of engagement strategies to build alignment with transition plan across counterparties and customers.
There are also significant overlaps to ISSB disclosure standards, including the establishment of roles and responsibilities for sustainability matters, and consideration of impacts on nature and stakeholders of a company’s commitments. This increasing consolidation across the sustainability landscape means that the opportunity to turn targets into action has never been better.
Across all three frameworks, we see four main actions that financial services firms can take to incorporate into their reporting and planning for net zero investing:
- Produce a credible plan for implementing their climate strategy
- Establish an engagement strategy across counterparties and link this to the transition plan
- Report on the use of carbon credits and offsets
- Identify interdependencies and interactions across counterparties, risks, and opportunities
At Baringa we’ve helped clients across the financial services industry undertake these actions, including credible transition planning, engagement strategies, carbon offset reviews, counterparty assessment, and opportunity identification. We continue to assist our clients in navigating these challenges and help them seize the resulting opportunities as we dive into more sustainable future while meeting ongoing regulatory requirements.
Please contact a member of our team if you'd like to learn more.
Related Insights
International sustainability reporting standards: A lead indicator for Australian regulation
When it comes to financial sector regulation, Australian organisations are looking at how other jurisdictions are implementing sustainability disclosures to understand what might be in store.
Read moreFive ways to maximise return on investment from climate scenario analysis
Conducted effectively, climate change scenario analysis can unlock strategic insights, enhance business’ climate capabilities and meet regulatory requirements.
Read moreHow should super CROs respond to evolving climate change expectations?
Discover how superannuation funds adapt to evolving climate change expectations and the challenges faced by Chief Risk Officers.
Read moreThe case for investing in energy efficiency for real estate
The drive for greater energy efficiency in real estate is rapidly gathering momentum. It is a pivotal moment for financial institutions to profit from the energy transition while building a stronger society and economy.
Read moreRelated Client Stories
Streamlining home insurance enables reducing operating costs
How do you deliver digital transformation with more certainty, fewer delays and minimal disruption - at a pace that defies conventional expectations?
Read moreFuture proofing ESG materiality assessments for a global insurer
How do you prepare now, to stay ahead of changing disclosure requirements?
Read moreSupporting reluctant customers to become a digital-first insurer
How did a leading healthcare cover provider overcome initial resistance from customers to encourage them to embrace new digital channels?
Read moreLeading the operational transformation that made a £4 billion insurance deal possible
How did an insurer cut through the complications of one of the biggest carve-outs in recent history to emerge stronger and better equipped for the future?
Read moreAre digital and AI delivering what your business needs?
Digital and AI can solve your toughest challenges and elevate your business performance. But success isn’t always straightforward. Where can you unlock opportunity? And what does it take to set the foundation for lasting success?